Skip to Main Content

UGST 1001 - Winter 23 Library Session

Let's Get Started:

  1. Two Questions in Jamboard (respond to one or both questions)
    1. What would you like to learn or discuss in today's class? 
    2. What would you like to know about the library, its tools or its services?

Source Analysis and Reflection

You've been given a list of topics related to university students to choose from. You must find 3 credible sources pertaining to your topic.

  • 1 scholarly, original research study
  • 1 scholarly review article (e.g. systematic review; literature review)
  • 1 non-scholarly but credible

You must answer the questions provided on your source analysis page relating to each source 

Today's class

  • Scholarly sources - original research vs. review
  • How to determine if a source is credible
  • Finding sources using LibrarySearch 

Scholarly Sources

Encyclopedias
Strengths: short, contains background information on a topic, normally a great starting point when you are just learning about a topic
Weaknesses: too short, print encyclopedias are out of date quickly, Wikipedia has reliability issues

Books and Book Chapters
Strengths: Provides an in-depth investigation into a topic
Weaknesses: too long, sometimes hard to tell whether it is scholarly

Scholarly Journal Articles
Strengths: often based on research findings or extensive review, written by experts, reviewed by experts, provides evidence
Weaknesses: Sometimes written using discipline-specific language or terminology, hard to understand,

Media Sources (news, online magazine articles)
Strengths: Good for current information
Weaknesses: Sometimes biased, sometimes written to entertain, often not written by experts, often not reviewed by experts

Websites & Social Media
Strengths: Highly accessible, includes government info
Weaknesses: It is hard to assess credibility and reliability...anyone can post online or create a website

Lectures, Ted Talks, Interviews, Recordings, Testimony
Strengths: Primary, first-hand accounts
Weaknesses: It is hard to assess credibility and reliability...single perspective relying on the accuracy of memory.

Scholarly articles typically have a few characteristics

  • They are peer-reviewed. (Peer review is a publication process)
  • They are published in scholarly peer-reviewed journals.
  • They are written for an academic audience and use technical language.
  • In the sciences and social sciences, they often follow a predictable format.
    • Abstract, introduction/literature review, methods, results, discussion/conclusion
  • They are generally written by researchers in universities or by professionals in a given field.
  • They should include references from other academic sources.
  • They should have a digital object identifier (DOI). This is usually located on the first page of the article (near the top or bottom)
Single studies Review articles

These will report on data gathered and analyzed as part of a single original experiment. They will be...

  • Peer-reviewed

  • A (relatively) predictable format

    • Abstract, introduction/literature, method, results, discussion/conclusion.

  • A hypothesis or research question (in the introduction)

  • A methods section in which the researchers describe how they have collected and analyzed data.

  • Quantitative and/or qualitative data that demonstrate the findings.

  • Conclusions about the experiment and its value to the scientific field.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

A review article will take a number of empirical articles, and perform some analysis. These articles are peer-reviewed.

There are a few different types:

  • Literature Reviews give a broad overview of a given topic at a moment in time. 

  • Systematic Reviews are a rigorous review of primary research articles, with explicit inclusion criteria. They're often used in the Health Sciences to gauge the effectiveness of specific interventions. Systematic reviews will discuss their inclusion criteria, search methods, and occasionally their search statement in the article. 

  • Meta-Analyses are statistical syntheses of collected data, as part of a systematic review

Original Research Articles (Primary Research) vs.  Review Articles 

There are different types of scholarly/peer-reviewed articles. The two main categories in the scientific literature are original research articles (also known as primary research) and review articles.

1. Original Research Articles (aka Primary Research)

An original research article, or sometimes referred to as primary research in science, will report on data gathered and analyzed as part of an original experiment. There will be a methods section in which the researchers describe how they have collected and analyzed data. Example of an original research article.

2. Review Article

A review article takes a number of original research articles, and performs some analysis. They do not collect new data.

There are a few different types:

  • Literature Reviews give a broad overview of a given topic at a moment in time. Example of a literature review.

  • Systematic Reviews are a rigorous review of original research articles, with explicit inclusion criteria. They're often used in the Health Sciences to gauge the effectiveness of specific interventions. Systematic reviews will discuss their inclusion criteria, search methods, and occasionally their search statement in the article. Example of a systematic review. Example of a systematic review.

Additional Tips for Reading Scholarly Articles

Scholarly articles often have a distinct structure.  While it may depend if you are looking at original research or a review article, you can read certain sections within a paper and it should tell you specific information. 

  • Abstract: A short summary of the article and its findings
  • Introduction: Background on the research topic, including references to other works that have laid the groundwork for current research on the topic
  • Methods: How the research has been conducted, how the researchers plan to gather data and to analyze it
  • Results: Data that has been gathered and organized in a meaningful way, including graphs, charts, and analysis of trends
  • Discussion: What the results mean, and what conclusions can be drawn
  • References: All other works the author refers to in the article

This activity will focus on scholarly research and hopefully give you some practice in identifying the difference between original/primary research and review articles. 

Article 1

Original Research Article (Primary Research): 26 votes (86.67%)
Review Article: 4 votes (13.33%)
This is not a scholarly article: 0 votes (0%)
Total Votes: 30
Original Research Article (Primary research): 7 votes (19.44%)
Review Article: 28 votes (77.78%)
This is not a scholarly article: 1 votes (2.78%)
Total Votes: 36
Original Research Article (Primary Research): 20 votes (45.45%)
Review Article: 24 votes (54.55%)
This is not a scholarly article: 0 votes (0%)
Total Votes: 44
Original Research Article (Primary Resarch): 1 votes (2.94%)
Review Article: 5 votes (14.71%)
This is not a scholarly article: 28 votes (82.35%)
Total Votes: 34
Original Research Article (Primary Research): 33 votes (97.06%)
Review Article: 0 votes (0%)
This is not a scholarly article: 1 votes (2.94%)
Total Votes: 34

Evaluating Sources for Credibility

When reading any information source, consider the following: 

  1. Is the author qualified to write about the topic?
  2. Does the resource incorporate quality reports or research?
  3. Is the language used objective, or emotional?
  4. Is the information being presented opinion based, or have a clear bias?
  5. Does the resource actually address your research topic or problem?
  6. Who is the intended audience?

Take a look at your assigned source and answer the following questions. You do not need to read the source in full.

1. What type of source is this (e.g. a website, a scholarly peer reviewed article, a book chapter, etc)?

2. Is this source trustworthy enough to use in an essay in this course? Why or why not? 

Group 1 

Scan the following resource 

Consider the following:

  • What are the qualifications of the author(s)?
  • What type of evidence do they use to support their argument? Data, personal opinions, etc.? eg: Do they cite anything? 
  • Who is the intended audience of this article? (eg: scholars, everyone, children etc.)
  • Does this source undergo any type of review or quality control?

Group 2 

Scan the following resource 

Consider the following:

  • What are the qualifications of the author(s)?
  • What type of evidence do they use to support their argument? Data, personal opinions, etc.? eg: Do they cite anything? 
  • Who is the intended audience of this article? (eg: scholars, everyone, children etc.)
  • Does this source undergo any type of review or quality control?

Group 3 

Scan the following resource 

Consider the following:

  • What are the qualifications of the author(s)?
  • What type of evidence do they use to support their argument? Data, personal opinions, etc.? eg: Do they cite anything? 
  • Who is the intended audience of this article? (eg: scholars, everyone, children etc.)
  • Does this source undergo any type of review or quality control?

Group 4 

Scan the following resource 

Consider the following:

  • What are the qualifications of the author(s)?
  • What type of evidence do they use to support their argument? Data, personal opinions, etc.? eg: Do they cite anything? 
  • Who is the intended audience of this article? (eg: scholars, everyone, children etc.)
  • Does this source undergo any type of review or quality control?

Group 5 

Scan the following resource 

Consider the following:

  • What are the qualifications of the author(s)?
  • What type of evidence do they use to support their argument? Data, personal opinions, etc.? eg: Do they cite anything? 
  • Who is the intended audience of this article? (eg: scholars, everyone, children etc.)
  • Does this source undergo any type of review or quality control?

Finding Scholarly Articles and Books using LibrarySearch

Questions to consider

  • Are you using the terminology that an expert in the field would use?
  • Is there more than one way to spell the word?
  • Are there any synonyms or other terms that could apply to your topic?
  • Are there sub-topics that can help you specify or narrow down your topic? 
  • Consider writing out your topic in a sentence and then highlighting the different concepts within.  For example: 

What are the benefits of  foreign exchange programs to undergraduate students

      Topic                   

Synonyms (terms you could use with OR)

Additional Terms (terms you could use with AND)

Narrowed Down Topic

foreign exchange

undergraduates

benefits

"field school"

OR "learning abroad"

OR "studying abroad 

OR travel

OR "international education" 

OR "experiential learning" 

 OR "community-based learning"  

university

OR undergraduate

OR college

OR post-secondary

OR "higher education" 

 

 

"academic success"

culture

travel

learning

language

employment

skills

"personal development"

disadvantages

funding

barriers

 

("field school"  OR "foreign exchange) AND (undergraduate OR college) AND students AND benefit

("learning abroad" OR international education) AND "personal development" AND ("post-secondary" OR university)

university AND ("study abroad" OR exchange) AND barriers

Library Search

Things to remember when using Library Search:

  1. Sign in to save searches, items, and to request materials.

  2. Use the pin icon to save books and articles. 

  3. Use the filters on the right. You will use Availability, Resource Type, and Date filters most often.

  4. Some items won't be available. You can request unavailable items using interlibrary loan.

  5. When viewing an item record, scroll down to the Get It or Full Text section to get the item.

You can search in a way to combine or omit different terms by telling the search engine exactly what you want…this can help you save some time (and frustration!)

  • Use quotation marks to keep phrases together - "undergraduate research"

  • Use  AND to combine search terms - "undergraduate research" AND benefits

  • Use OR to connect two or more similar terms - "student research" OR "undergraduate research" 

  • Use wild cards to substitute a letter or suffix with a symbol - educat* (education; educational; educate etc.)

Search Google Scholar

Google Scholar is another great way to find peer-reviewed/scholarly material. Google scholar has a nifty citation chaining function.  The Cited by function will forward you to indexed scholarly material that has cited an article that you may be interested in.  The Related Articles link will direct you to similar articles that may have the same metadata or keywords. 

The Advanced Search is found by clicking the menu icon (top left).
Besides providing links to articles in MRU databases, Google Scholar links to online repositories that contain articles the author has been allowed to upload.  Academia.edu and ResearchGate are among the repositories searched by Google Scholar.

By clicking on the Settings icon, you can select library links to show library access for up to 5 libraries (type in Mount Royal and click on save).  If you are logged into MRU library, links should automatically populate if you are running a Google search in another window. 
 

Note: Google uses different commands: ~; -; +; but AND/OR also works

If you are searching Google (not Google Scholar), you can also limit your search to show specific websites. Eg:

  • site:un.org (United Nations)
  • site:gc.ca (Government of Canada)
  • site:en.unesco.org (UNESCO)
  • site:worldbank.org (World Bank)
  • site:wto.org (World Trade Organization)

Citation Resources

  • Cite Sources: Learn the correct way to cite sources by using these guides, tutorials, and videos.
  • Referencing Webinars: APA & MLA. Referencing Webinars are 75 minutes long.  Registration is required.
  • Online Appointments: Personalized online 30-minute appointments with a Learning Strategist.

Library Information Systems

Profile Photo
Library Systems
Contact:
Room G206
6784