Skip to Main Content

CRJS 1003 Library Session

For this course, you are tasked to complete two writing assignments requiring you to research a topic, citing peer-reviewed and credible sources and formatting your papers in APA.  Please consult your course outline posted on D2L for details about these assignments

  • Op-Ed - (you must integrate 8 reliable/credible sources into your work).  Here is an example of a well-researched op-ed.  *Remember you have to format in APA
  • Misinformation Essay - (You must use 8 references, and 4 of those should be peer-reviewed.) 
  • Briefly go over the assignment.
  • Discuss what peer-reviewed means.
  • Speak to different types of information you will encounter during your search.
  • Ask you to engage in several learning activities that can develop your critical evaluation skills.
  • Speak to Misinformation
  • Demonstrate some possibilities of how you can break down your topic
  • Demonstrate how to find good sources relating to your topic using the library, and Google Scholar
  • Speak to citation, and where to find guides and help.

Why using good sources matter...

When you endeavor to find sources related to a topic of interest for your academic writing, you are demonstrating a number of skills

  • You are able to synthesize a variety of information and integrate it into your own work
  • You are able to investigate the dialogue that has occurred related to an area of interest and engage in that conversation through your academic writing
  • Using good, credible reliable sources will elevate the accuracy and authority of your own work

Authority is Constructed and Contextual

Information, in any format, is produced to convey a message and is shared via a selected delivery method.  The iterative processes of researching, creating, revising, and disseminating information vary, and the resulting produce reflects these differences (ACRL par. 13).

  • Information creations are valued differently depending on the context and purpose for which they are created
  • Audience matters. Certain things are created for specific purposes and don't make one format of information better. It is up to us to discern what information process best fits our information needs.
  • In your own creation process, understand that your choices in what type of information you use, impact the purpose for which the information product you create will be used and the message it conveys.

Source: Project Cora https://www.projectcora.org/assignment/information-spectrum

[Image caption: Rainbow spectrum displaying a horizontal axis (traditional to emerging information sources) and verticle axis (public and exclusive information sources).]

scholarly publication contains articles written by experts in a particular field. The primary audience of these articles is other experts. ... Academics use a variety of terms and language to describe this: "peer-reviewed", vetted academic, or "refereed". They all mean essentially the same thing and refer to the editorial and publication process in which scholars in the same field review the research and findings before the article is published, checking for validity, originality, and quality. 

  Scholarly / Peer-Reviewed Popular/Not Scholarly
Author Expert Journalist / Professional Writer
Review Reviewed by an editorial board or other experts ("peers") Reviewed by an editor
Audience /
Language
Scholars and students / Academic
Technical language
General public
Easy to understand
Content

Original Research
Uses previously published literature for background

News and practical information
Uses a variety of sources for background 
Sources Always cited Sometimes cited
Examples

Peer-reviewed articles
Scholarly books
Literature reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analysis
Thesis and dissertations

Academic encyclopedias

Magazine articles
Newspaper articles
Blog articles
web encyclopedias (wiki)
Websites
Social media

  1. What are the author’s credentials? Is it written by an expert?
  2. Published in a journal (is there a DOI?) If you are not sure if it is a journal article enter the title of the publication into Ulrichs Web
  3. Academic language
  4. Includes reference list
  5. Length
  6. A "Received" and "Accepted" date
  7. Is it an actual article? Sometimes other types of content are included in scholarly publications, such as editorials/opinion pieces and book reviews.  Make sure you are looking at an article. 

Examples

Gibbs Van Brunschot, E., Abela, G., Witt, C., & Hak, J. W. (2023). ‘Poisoned Chalice?’: the challenges of forensic science and technology for homicide investigations. Police practice and research24(4), 475-492.

Yanushkevich, S. N., Sundberg, K. W., Twyman, N. W., Guest, R. M., & Shmerko, V. P. (2019). Cognitive checkpoint: Emerging technologies for biometric-enabled watchlist screening. Computers & Security85, 372-385.

Scholarly: 4 votes (11.76%)
Not Scholarly: 30 votes (88.24%)
Total Votes: 34
Scholarly: 17 votes (47.22%)
Not Scholarly: 19 votes (52.78%)
Total Votes: 36
Scholarly: 1 votes (3.57%)
Not Scholarly: 27 votes (96.43%)
Total Votes: 28
Scholarly: 27 votes (100%)
Not Scholarly: 0 votes (0%)
Total Votes: 27
Scholarly: 12 votes (36.36%)
Not Scholarly: 21 votes (63.64%)
Total Votes: 33
Scholarly: 27 votes (90%)
Not Scholarly: 3 votes (10%)
Total Votes: 30

 

Mis-information is when false information is shared, but no harm is meant. 

Dis-information is when false information is knowingly shared to cause harm. 

Mal-information is when genuine information is shared to cause harm, often by moving information designed to stay private into the public sphere.

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking (Vol. 27, pp. 1-107). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Take a look at these two sources. Are they credible/reliable? 

Group 1 (Birthdays January-June)

Group 2 (Birthday July-December)

Consider the following: 

Read Laterally - Investigate.  Google the group.  Check the "About" page on the website.  What is the web telling you about this organization? 

Fact Check - consider the source -is it trustworthy? Biases? What other things have they published? 

Trade up - check this source using sources that are known to be trustworthy.  Try sites like Snopes, AFP Factcheck, Politifact, TIneye

Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2017). Lateral reading: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information.

Let's try this quick activity:  

Take a look at the image below.  Using the link provided, type in words or phrases that you would use to describe this image. Think: how would I search to retrieve a similar image? 

[Figure 1. jobbgem. Traffic [Photograph].https://flic.kr/p/4roEou]

What words would you use to describe this photo? 

Questions to consider

  • Are you using the terminology that an expert in the field would use?
  • Is there more than one way to spell the word?
  • Are there any synonyms or other terms that could apply to your topic
Broad Topic Concept 1 Concept 2 Concept 3 Possible Search Strategy

How mainstream media, social media, and
misinformation can impact and influence people’s

perceptions and understanding of the Canadian

criminal justice system.

Mainstream media etc

"social media"

(twitter OR X)

"mainstream media"

news

"fake news"

misinformation

"false information"

"alt-right"

"alt-left"

disinformation

"confirmation bias"

(images OR photographs)

amplification

"echo chamber"

"filter bubble"

mal-information

"post truth"

"information disorder"

Public Perception

"public opinion"

"public belief"

"public trust"

mistrust

"popular opinion"

framing

Canadian justice system

"Canadian courts"

"justice system"

police

RCMP

"law enforcement"

"policing agencies"

"local government"

Canada AND (misinformation OR disinformation) AND "social media"  AND "public trust"

AND"justice system" 

 

"fake news" AND public AND trust AND police AND Canada

"information disorder" AND Canada AND ("justice system" OR police) "public opinion"

 

Using the Library 

There are a few ways to use the library.  

  • Use the library search box/Library Search - allows you to search the entire collection.  
  • Search in subject-specific databases - I have them listed under the databases tab on the CRJS guide.  You will be searching a smaller collection of sources.
  • Search in discipline-specific journals - This type of search will definitely yield fewer results.  It helps to know the publication title to use this feature effectively, but you can also type in a broader topic, as long as that word is contained within the title of the journal  Eg: forensic

 

Search Smarter!

You can search in a way to combine or omit different terms by telling the search engine exactly what you want…this can help you save some time (and frustration!)

  • Use quotation marks to keep phrases together - "Black Lives Matter"

  • Use  AND to combine search terms - "police violence" AND protester

  • Use OR to connect two or more similar terms - BLM OR "Black Lives Matter"

  • Use wild cards to substitute a letter or suffix with a symbol - demonstr*

 

Library Search

Things to remember when using Library Search:

  1. Sign in to save searches, items, and to request materials.

  2. Use the pin icon to save books and articles. 

  3. Use the filters on the right. You will use Availability, Resource Type, and Date filters most often.

  4. Some items won't be available. You can request unavailable items using interlibrary loan.

  5. When viewing an item record, scroll down to the Get It or Full Text section to get the item.

Search Google Scholar

Google Scholar is another great way to find peer-reviewed/scholarly material. Google Scholar has a nifty citation chaining function.  The Cited by function will forward you to indexed scholarly material that has cited an article that you may be interested in.  The Related Articles link will direct you to similar articles that may have the same metadata or keywords. 

The Advanced Search is found by clicking the menu icon (top left).
Besides providing links to articles in MRU databases, Google Scholar links to online repositories that contain articles the author has been allowed to upload.  Academia.edu and ResearchGate are among the repositories searched by Google Scholar.

By clicking on the Settings icon, you can select library links to show library access for up to 5 libraries (type in Mount Royal and click on save).  If you are logged into the MRU library, links should automatically populate if you are running a Google search in another window. 

  • Cite Sources: Learn the correct way to cite sources by using these guides, tutorials, and videos.
  • Referencing Webinars: APA & MLA. Referencing Webinars are 75 minutes long.  Registration is required.
  • Online Appointments: Personalized online 30-minute appointments with a Learning Strategist.

New SLS APA Referencing Tutorial on D2L

This self-paced 90-minute tutorial covers the same content as our live workshop—why citation is important along with the basics of in-text citations and reference entries in APA Style. Students who complete the tutorial will gain access to a form they can fill out and submit as proof of completion.

Access the tutorial on D2L: Using Google Chrome as your web browser, log in to D2L (learn.mru.ca) with your @mtroyal.ca account. Click the “Discover” tab, then type “APA” in the search bar. Click on the “APA Referencing Tutorial” link and then the “Enroll in Course” button. If you have any questions about the tutorial, contact sls@mtroyal.ca.

Librarian

Profile Photo
Madelaine Vanderwerff
she/her

Contact:
Email: mvanderwerff@mtroyal.ca
Office: EL4441M