The Assignment
Group Presentation
Topics will integrate:
- Assigned/text readings
- Field experiences
- Developing teaching philosophies, ideas, or practicum examples
It is expected that the topic of research will include 5 research references. Groups will be expected to submit a copy of their presentation, presentation notes and/or references to a group D2L drop box at the end of their presentation date.
Your topic:
Clear: easily understood by your audience
Focused: narrow enough to allow you to address it in your presentation
Concise: expressed in the fewest possible words
Complex: Cannot be answered with yes or no. Is not a leading question
Open: open to research - should generate discussion and more questions
_____________________________________
Add your topic to the Padlet on a sticky note.
What is your topic? culturally-responsive teaching
Rephrase your topic as a narrower question:
How does the use of diverse children's literature contribute to a culturally-responsive teaching practice?
Searching the databases
Consider age groups and specific curriculum areas (literacy, mathematics, arts etc.) to assist in narrowing your topic:
Start with a preliminary search. Consider popular sources (relevant websites news etc. to determine your interests. Revise your research question and your search strategy.
Sample
Library Search:
"culturally-responsive" "elementary education"
teacher elementary "academic achievement"
teacher elementary "academic achievement"
"culturally-responsive" "elementary education"
Refined
Sample
Library Search:
"culturally-responsive" "elementary education" "children's literature"
Article Databases
Canadian Education Organizations
Consult the ATA for relevant reports
"trauma-informed practice"
Consult the Canadian Education Association/ EdCan Network
"culturally-responsive" site:www.edcan.ca
Citation
Understanding plagiarism in the age of AI
The use of generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Grammarly GO) raises new questions about authorship and attribution. The MRU Code of Student Academic Integrity considers it academic misconduct to submit work that is not your own or that relies on unacknowledged tools or assistance—including AI-generated content.
