Skip to Main Content

Assignment Overview

1. Library Assignment

  • Due Date: October 28, 11:59 PM via D2L.
  • Purpose: This assignment helps students learn how to select and cite suitable scholarly sources for their Virtual Exhibition. During the library session on October 21, students will explore how to find and evaluate scholarly sources in the MRU library catalogue, with a focus on sources related to the theme of 'identity.'

Assignment Guidelines:

  • Students must find two scholarly sources on the theme of 'identity,' which could relate to topics such as gender, race/ethnicity, cultural identity, religious identity, warfare, violence, politics, rhetoric, or technology.
  • These sources will support their analysis of how selected images in the Virtual Exhibition communicate aspects of identity and memory.

Submission Details:

  • Students must submit a correct 'Works Cited' page entry for each source in either MLA or Chicago style (APA is not accepted).
  • For each source, students must also provide:
    1. The author’s credentials and their qualifications.
    2. An explanation of why the source is scholarly.
    3. The source's relevance to the student's research topic.

The assignment should be typed in 12-point Times New Roman, double-spaced, and include a title page.


2. Virtual Exhibition Assignment

Objective:

Students are tasked with curating a virtual exhibition that explores the theme of identity. The exhibition will act as a visual essay, using a cohesive collection of artifacts to address a specific research question and support a central thesis.

Assignment Guidelines:

  • Format: Students can use online platforms like WordPress, Prezi, or Artsteps to host their exhibition, or opt for offline formats like PowerPoint or Word.
  • Content:
    • Include 7-10 artifacts (e.g., artworks) that relate to the theme of identity.
    • Each artifact should have a 150-200 word label and be correctly cited.
    • The exhibition must present a "big idea statement," which acts as the thesis, defining the scope and purpose of the exhibit.
  • Themes to Consider:
    • Gender, race/ethnicity, cultural identity, religious identity, warfare and violence, politics, rhetoric, technology, etc.

Key Components:

  1. Introduction: Present a clear "big idea" or thesis statement.
  2. Artifact Selection: Choose 7-10 artifacts that align with the theme. Each should have its own label and proper citation.
  3. Analysis: Provide in-depth interpretation and analysis of each artifact, linking them to the exhibition’s thesis.
  4. Conclusion: Summarize the key insights demonstrated in the exhibition.

Requirements:

  • Word Count: 1,200-1,500 words.
  • Citations: Follow MLA or Chicago formatting. Include figure captions with artist details, medium, dimensions, and historical context.

Academic Sources

Scholarly vs. Popular Sources

A scholarly publication features articles written by experts for other experts. These are often called "peer-reviewed," "academic," or "refereed" journals. This means that before an article is published, it is reviewed by other scholars in the same field to ensure the research and findings are reliable.

Scholarly / Peer-Reviewed

Popular / Not Scholarly (but possibly still credible!)

Author

  • Expert

  • Journalist / professional writer

Review Process

  • Reviewed by an editorial board or other experts ("peers")

  • Reviewed by an editor

Audience /
Language

  • Scholars and students

  • Technical language

  • General public

  • Easy to understand

Content

  • Original research

  • Uses previously published literature for background

  • News and practical information

  • Uses a variety of sources for background 

Sources

  • Always cited

  • Sometimes cited

Examples

  • Peer-reviewed articles

  • Scholarly books

  • Literature reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses

  • Theses and dissertations

  • Magazine articles

  • Newspaper articles

  • Blog articles

  • Encyclopedias

  • Textbooks

  • Websites

  • Social media


The Peer Review Process

Resource: "The Peer Review Process" - Wiley Publishing

Peer Review Process

(Source: Wiley, Wiley Author Services, n.d.)

One method for evaluating source quality is by using RADAR

Relevance

  • Does this source fit my topic?

  • What is this source's intended audience?

    • Is that intended audience appropriate for my use case in this assignment?

Authority

  • Is/are the creator(s) of this source clearly identified or known to us?

  • How important is it in this use case to trust the source's creator(s)?

    • If it is important, why should we trust the source's creator(s)?

    • Is the source's creator credentialed or an expert in their field?

Date

  • Is the creation or publication date of this source identified or known to us?

  • Is this source too old?

Accuracy

  • Do this source's facts "check out"?

  • Does the source have references of its own?

Reason (for Creation)

  • Why was this source made?

  • Was this source made to sell a product or service, to inform/educate, to entertain, etc?

(Source: SAIT)

Instructions

  1. Open the links for each source.
    Review each one, focusing on the publication type, author’s background, and overall credibility.

  2. Answer the following questions for each source, using the Google Form

    • What type of publication is this? (e.g., article, book, magazine)
    • What are the author’s credentials, and why are they qualified on this topic?
    • Is this a scholarly source? Why or why not? List characteristics to support your answer.

Sources:

  1. The World of Online Gaming Is “Uniquely Uncivil” for Women and People of Colour
  2. Enacting Culture in Gaming: A Video Gamer's Literacy Experiences and Practices
    Library Search Link
  3. Gaming at the Edge: Sexuality and Gender at the Margins of Gamer Culture
    Library Search Link | Web Link

Google Form Link

https://forms.gle/A59ZHhV8K4map5E28

Head to the MRU Library citation guides to get guidance on paper formatting and referencing sources.

Finding and Using Images for Your Research

When conducting research, it's essential to use high-quality, properly licensed images. Below are resources and links to help you find images through our library and the web.


Library Resources

  1. MRU Library Search
    Use the main library search to find books, articles, and images from a wide range of databases. This is a great starting point to find images that may be embedded within articles or books.

  2. Image Databases at MRU
    Explore specialized databases dedicated to images, including visual art, historical photographs, and multimedia collections.


Images on the Web

  • Flickr Creative Commons
    Find images offered under Creative Commons licenses, which allow for different levels of use and adaptation.

  • Wikimedia Commons
    Search for freely usable media files, including images, videos, and sound recordings.

  • Pexels
    Browse a collection of high-quality stock photos that are free to use for both personal and commercial purposes.

  • Tineye
    Upload an image or paste a URL to find similar images across the web. Useful for tracing the original source or finding additional context.

  • Google Images Search
    Use Google’s image search to find high-profile images, but be sure to check the usage rights to avoid copyright issues.


Archival Collections

Librarian

Profile Photo
Erik Christiansen

Contact:
Email: echristiansen@mtroyal.ca
Phone: 403.440.5168
Office: EL4423C
Website