Skip to Main Content

Class objectives

(Image by 3D Animation Production Company from Pixabay)

By the end of this class, you will be able to do the following:

  1. Be able to explain the concept of "lateral reading."
  2. Have practiced lateral reading by evaluating a particular publication.
  3. Be able to explain the concept of peer-reviewed.
  4. Be able to locate and conduct searches for scholarly materials in the MRU LibrarySearch.

 

Assignments

Learning Task 3

The task aims to teach students how to evaluate online sources using lateral reading techniques, recognizing that online sources may have fewer publication barriers and can contain disinformation or biased content. Students will apply lateral reading to assess the credibility and reliability of one chosen website.

Process:

Students are asked to pick one of the following online sources:

  • Friends of Science
  • Democracy Now!
  • The Epoch Times
  • Unicorn Riot
  • Rebel News
  • True North Centre for Public Policy

Using lateral reading, students must answer the following questions:

Questions (Each worth 3 points, totaling 18 points):

  1. Homepage Description: What does the homepage look like? What types of information are displayed?
  2. Authors' Information: Who are the main authors of the site, and what qualifications do they have?
  3. Information Quality: Does the site use references or citations? Is the content biased or of high quality?
  4. Backers, Funders, or Sponsors: Who supports the site? How might this influence the content?
  5. Fact-Checking: What do fact-checking organizations report about the site?
  6. Primary and Secondary Audiences: Who is the content targeting? How does the content appeal to these audiences?
  7. Reliability Assessment: Is this a reliable source? Justify your answer based on the previous questions.

Research Paper Proposal

Purpose: This proposal helps students plan their research paper by creating a structured outline.

Components:

  • Introduction: Includes an engaging opening, a clear thesis statement, and a preview of main arguments.
  • Body Paragraphs: Students outline at least three body paragraphs, specifying the topic, supporting evidence, and related sources.
  • Conclusion: Restates the thesis, summarizes main topics, and suggests areas for future research.
  • References List: Requires at least four reliable sources, including three secondary sources and one from the course, formatted in APA Style.
  • Product: The proposal must be submitted as a PDF using an APA template.
  • Grading: Worth 10% of the final grade, evaluated based on the quality of each component (introduction, body paragraphs, conclusion, and references)​

Research Paper

Purpose: This assignment requires students to create and defend a central thesis on a topic discussed in class, focusing on research, analysis, writing, and citation skills.

Process:

  • Topics: Students choose from a range of topics related to digital writing and media or propose their own (subject to approval).
  • Thesis Statement: A concise, debatable statement that guides the entire paper.
  • Sources: At least four academic sources are required, including one course reading and three additional secondary sources.
  • Peer Review: Students will participate in a peer review workshop and include a paragraph in their paper describing how they used the feedback.
  • Formatting: The paper must follow APA Style, including proper citations, and be submitted as a PDF.
  • Grading: Worth 30% of the final grade, assessed on introduction, body paragraphs, conclusion, research quality, writing clarity, APA formatting, and peer review integration​

Exercise: Practice Lateral Reading

Lateral Reading

Definition of lateral reading, according to Terrell Heick

"In brief, lateral reading (as opposed to vertical reading) is the act of verifying what you’re reading as you’re reading it. More on that in a moment" (Heick, 2020).

The Difference Between Lateral Reading And Vertical Reading

(Source: The Difference Between Lateral Reading And Vertical Reading, Terrell Heick, 2020)


Resources:

(Source: Tim Magliery on Flickr)

In this exercise, you will practice lateral reading, a critical thinking strategy that involves verifying the credibility of information. Instead of just reading what’s on a webpage, lateral readers look for external perspectives to assess the reliability and accuracy of the content. 

For this activity, you will analyze the New York Post, a popular news outlet, by answering the following questions. As you work through each question, consider how the source's presentation, background, and external evaluations impact its credibility.

Questions to Answer

  • Homepage Description: What does the homepage look like? What types of information are displayed?
  • Authors' Information: Who are the main authors of the site, and what qualifications do they have?
  • Information Quality: Does the site use references or citations? Is the content biased or of high quality?
  • Backers, Funders, or Sponsors: Who supports the site? How might this influence the content?
  • Fact-Checking: What do fact-checking organizations report about the site?

Submit answers on Padelet

Open Padlet and put your answers under each column.

One method for evaluating source quality is by using RADAR

Relevance

Does this source fit my topic?

What is this source's intended audience?

Is that intended audience appropriate for my use case in this assignment?

Authority

Is/are the creator(s) of this source clearly identified or known to us?

How important is it in this use case to trust the source's creator(s)?

If it is important, why should we trust the source's creator(s)?

Is the source's creator credentialed or an expert in their field?

Date

Is the creation or publication date of this source identified or known to us?

Is this source too old?

Accuracy

Do this source's facts "check out"?

Does the source have references of its own?

Reason (for Creation)

Why was this source made?

Was this source made to sell a product or service, to inform/educate, to entertain, etc?

(Source: SAIT)

Scholarly Sources

Scholarly vs. Popular Sources

(Image of a messy research desk, DALL-E, created 2024-10-21)


Definition: A scholarly publication features articles written by experts for other experts. These are often called "peer-reviewed," "academic," or "refereed" journals. This means that before an article is published, it is reviewed by other scholars in the same field to ensure the research and findings are reliable.

Scholarly / Peer-Reviewed

Popular / Not Scholarly (but possibly still credible!)

Author

  • Expert

  • Journalist / professional writer

Review Process

  • Reviewed by an editorial board or other experts ("peers")

  • Reviewed by an editor

Audience /
Language

  • Scholars and students

  • Technical language

  • General public

  • Easy to understand

Content

  • Original research

  • Uses previously published literature for background

  • News and practical information

  • Uses a variety of sources for background 

Sources

  • Always cited

  • Sometimes cited

Examples

  • Peer-reviewed articles

  • Scholarly books

  • Literature reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses

  • Theses and dissertations

  • Magazine articles

  • Newspaper articles

  • Blog articles

  • Encyclopedias

  • Textbooks

  • Websites

  • Social media

The Peer Review Process

(Image of scholar conducting a peer review, DALL-E, created 2024-10-21)


Peer Review Process

(Source: Wiley, Wiley Author Services, n.d.)

LibrarySearch 

LibrarySearch is MRU Library's one-stop search interface/catalogue that brings together resources across format, time, and subject.

 

(Conducting Academic Research With LibrarySearch)


Things to remember when using LibrarySearch:

  1. Sign in to save searches, and items, and to request materials.

  2. Use the pin icon to save books and articles to your Favorites for future reference.

  3. Use the filters on the right. You will use Availability, Resource Type, and Date filters most often. Filter settings can be "locked in" so that you don't have to reapply them to every search that you make.

  4. Some items may not be available, however, you can request unavailable items using what is called interlibrary loan.

  5. When viewing an item record, scroll down to the Get it (for hardcopy/physical items) or Access options (for electronic items) section to get access to the item.


Search Tips for LibrarySearch

(Adapted from “Developing your search strategy,” University of Leeds)

You can use search operators to combine or exclude terms, helping you get better results faster.

Quotation Marks: Use quotation marks to keep phrases together.

  • Examples: “public space”, “inclusive design”, “artificial intelligence”, “fast fashion”, “#FreeBritney”

AND: Combine terms with AND to narrow your search.

  • Examples: “inclusive design” AND “public libraries”, “artificial intelligence” AND labour

OR: Use OR to search for synonyms or similar terms and broaden your search.

  • Examples: “climate change” OR “global warming”, “artificial intelligence” OR “AI”

Truncation: Use * to search for different word endings.

  • Example: access* will find accessible, accessibility, etc

Librarian

Profile Photo
Erik Christiansen

Contact:
Email: echristiansen@mtroyal.ca
Phone: 403.440.5168
Office: EL4423C
Website